What Dearth of New Banks Means for the Industry's Future
The U.S. House Oversight and Government Reform Committee
recently examined the fact that only three banks have been organized since 2009
and what that means for banking in this country. Prior to 2009, between 100 and
200 new banks were formed every year, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of
Richmond. The Richmond study analyzed whether this pattern was similar to prior
recessions and found it was very unusual. In all prior periods, the quantity of
new bank applications dipped during the recession, but quickly rebounded to
normal levels during the recovery. Following the last recession, however, the
numbers dropped virtually to zero and remain flat-lined today. One outcome will
be a lack of sufficient services for small businesses and consumers, with rural
areas particularly harmed. Another concern is that a dearth of new banks will
lead the industry to become even more concentrated in a few very large banks,
eventually undoing the fundamental structure of the U.S. banking system. The
Richmond study and other analysis suggest regulatory policies have a
significant role in the dearth of new banks, not just economic conditions.
Regulators tightened their standards during the recession, but the time may
have come to readjust for the good of the economy.
From "What Dearth of New Banks Means for the Industry's Future"
American Banker (08/17/16) Sutton, George
From "What Dearth of New Banks Means for the Industry's Future"
American Banker (08/17/16) Sutton, George
No comments:
Post a Comment